Solving the Housing Crisis: A Comprehensive Approach
The housing crisis across British Columbia (BC) and Canada has become a defining issue of our time, characterized by skyrocketing rents, acute shortages of homes, and the pervasive specter of homelessness. While some have benefited from these rising prices, the impacts on low- and middle-income households are severe, stifling economic progress and exacerbating inequalities. However, experts assert that this crisis is not insurmountable. With concerted and strategic efforts, addressing the housing shortage is possible.
Understanding the Crisis
The current housing landscape depicts a troubling picture: high rents and prices, insufficient homes, and widespread displacement. This crisis extends beyond just economic metrics; it intertwines with various social issues, including poverty, climate action, and access to childcare. Consequently, the housing crisis manifests as a barrier that stifles individual potential and communal prosperity.
Three key strategies are vital to combatting this crisis:
- Nonmarket Housing: A substantial increase in public investment is crucial.
- Overall Housing Supply: Tackling the severe shortage across both market and nonmarket sectors.
- City-Level Roadblocks: Reforming municipal policies that inhibit housing development, such as apartment bans.
The Need for Nonmarket Housing
Although increasing market housing supply is undoubtedly essential, it cannot be the sole solution. Canada has significantly underinvested in public, nonprofit, and co-op housing, resulting in a meager 3.5% of the country’s housing stock being classified as social housing—compared to the OECD average of about 7%. This gap has fostered worsening waitlists for social housing and inflated homelessness rates in one of the world’s wealthiest nations.
To rectify this, BC should aim to construct at least 25,000 new nonmarket homes annually. This ambitious goal, while requiring cooperation from all levels of government, is achievable with the right funding and political commitment. Currently, BC’s provincial government aims for just 4,500 new nonmarket homes each year—far below what is needed.
Increasing Overall Housing Supply
Beyond nonmarket housing, it is imperative to address the overall housing shortage. Despite public assertions of rapid housing development, statistics reveal that housing starts in BC and Canada have lagged considerably behind the levels seen in the post-war years. Low rental vacancy rates, which should ideally hover around 3%, remain alarmingly low—often below 1% in Vancouver—indicating a severe imbalance in the housing market.
A welcome uptick in vacancy rates this year has led to a marginal decline in rents in cities like Vancouver and Toronto. However, these improvements are likely transient unless accompanied by significant and sustained increases in new housing production. Chronic shortages compel many into undesirable living arrangements, such as young adults living with their parents longer or unwanted communal living situations—reflecting what is termed "suppressed household formation."
City-Level Policies Must Change
Municipal regulations hold a crucial sway over housing policies, yet cities like Vancouver perpetuate exclusionary zoning that effectively bans apartment buildings on three-quarters of residential land. This misalignment between land availability and housing needs exacerbates shortages and pushes housing costs higher.
For example, the lengthy and costly rezoning processes create hurdles for developers. The rezoning costs can range from $500,000 to $1 million, making many affordable housing projects financially unviable. Additionally, these policies often result in tenant displacement by funneling developments into older apartment complexes, leading to demolitions and evictions.
To articulate a solution, cities must permit low-rise, multi-unit dwellings in areas where single-family homes currently exist. Removing barriers such as onerous development fees and frontage requirements can lead to quicker housing production and more affordable options for residents.
Real-World Examples of Success
The Sen̓áḵw project spearheaded by the Squamish Nation exemplifies success when zoning restrictions do not limit development. This initiative aims to deliver 6,000 rental homes, including affordable units, on reserve land. Similarly, reforms in Auckland, New Zealand, have demonstrated the impact of easing zoning regulations—resulting in 22,000 more homes being approved in a five-year span, stabilizing rents in the process.
Both examples affirm that strategic policies fostering new construction have the potential not only to alleviate immediate housing pressures but also to encourage economic stability and growth.
The Path Forward
To alleviate the housing crisis, cities must shift their policies to support the development of multi-unit dwellings in previously restricted areas. This includes allowing for six-story apartment buildings by right in neighborhoods currently dominated by single-family homes, thereby expediting the housing delivery process at a lower cost.
Furthermore, robust federal and provincial funding must align with these structural changes to ensure that affordable housing initiatives are sustainable and scaleable. A portion of the vast wealth tied up in land, particularly in high-value residential markets, could serve as a vital funding resource for these initiatives.
Conclusion
The ongoing housing crisis in Canada is a product of long-standing public policy choices, including chronic underinvestment and exclusionary zoning. However, the potential to instigate change exists. By scaling nonmarket housing development, increasing overall supply, and dismantling municipal barriers to construction, governments can forge a more equitable housing system.
While the current discourse is replete with housing policy announcements, what’s essential is the follow-through. The road to a stable, affordable housing landscape is demanding, but it’s a challenge worth accepting. Solving the housing crisis is possible, but it will require resolute action and determination—no more half measures. It’s time for all levels of government to prioritize the urgent need for abundant, affordable homes for all Canadians.


